Goodbye 2007

December 31st, 2007 • 2 comments General

You’ve been full of interruptions, full of strange decisions.

You’ve set two of my friends free of their Dilbert’ese jobs.

You’ve made me cut down my feeds, my reads, and my emails.

You’ve been teaching me a lesson, and showing me new visions.

Goodbye 2007.

Reading RSS Smartly

December 10th, 2007 • General

Since the early days of FeedDemon, I heard Nick gripe about information overflow, and how he wasted time sifting through irrelevant stories.

I bumped into AideRSS, a feed reader that ranks posts and stories by the number of conversations. The idea is simple: count the number of links from Technorati, del.icio.us and the likes, and convert it to a rank relative to the rest of the posts from the same blog.

It might not sound very exciting, until you hit that spot of 100+ posts a day, then you’ll appreciate having a tiny robot filtering your news and giving you the relevant stories.

Rails 2.0 Released

December 8th, 2007 • 1 comment General

I can’t believe it’s been that long. It feels like yesterday, but four and half years have past by.

I don’t think there’s a better time to learn, or relearn, Rails. It’s a 2.0 release, which should give you some peace of mind. It’s overhauled, so it feels less “hacky”. And it’s not as hyped anymore, so you can see it for what it is, a tool not a myth.

Take a look at David’s notes on the new release. Tell me if it’s too quite for a 2.0.

My Experience With Apple

October 31st, 2007 • 1 comment General

Had Dali and Picasso never been born, my favorite work of art would have been that of Tom Hughes and John Casado. The nostalgic, the sentimentalists, and those who appreciate art, know exactly what I’m talking about.

Early ’90s, I put my hands on a Macintosh Classic II. It was a striking departure from the bulky interface of Windows 3.0, the difficulty of command-line MS-DOS, and the funny-looking collection of hardware we called a PC.

But my Classic II never became a production computer. With its tiny screen, and its meagre memory, it remained a toy for me to play with every once in a while. I loved it, but it was useless.

Skipping the Color Classic, the PowerBook and the Quadra, my next Apple computer was a full-tower PowerMac, though I can’t quite remember the exact model number. It ran a familiar operating system, something very similar to my Classic II, only it ran much faster.

I believe I was lucky that the first Apple OS I tried was System 7, a polished, intuitive environment where I didn’t have to worry much about what’s going on underneath. Apple went out of their way to make sure System 7 hooked in new-comers, while still satisfied the loyal customers.

However, Intel introduced the Pentium, and a couple of years later, Microsoft introduced Windows 95¹. Apple’s System 7 suddenly felt out-dated. “It can’t multi-task”, my anti-Apple friends cried out, “It doesn’t run Office”, “It’s made by a fruit!”. But System 7 was still a more polished, more intuitive, and a better-performing system.

1994-1999 witnessed the decline of Apple’s market share. The PC was hungrily biting chunks of Apple’s market, manufacturers were growing like fungi, and Intel wasn’t standing behind Apple like it is today.

Yet Apple had a certain significance, especially for those of us who came to love the two smiling faces, and especially in the Middle East. You had “designer cred” if you owned a Mac. You were someone who knows what he’s doing.

That’s what Apple signified in the Middle East: Designers. The only reason anyone would buy a Mac was to run Photoshop. Not only because Photoshop ran faster, but also because it never crashed. Windows 95 couldn’t hold a candle to the stability of MacOS. But then again, we all know how it didn’t matter.

The next upgrade was a PowerMac G3. It was almost identical to its older sibling. The only difference aside from performance, was the new and colorful MacOS 8. OS 8 wasn’t as stable as its predecessor, not until several months after its release. But it did its job, and only hang when our Media100 did something complicated.

Quickly after that, we brought in a B&W G3, followed by a similar-looking G4, both of which ran MacOS 9. The last “modern” operating system². That G4 was the last Apple computer that I used on a daily basis. It is also the last PowerPC-only Apple computer.

It might be because Apple was too expensive in the Middle East, or because Apple’s support in the region was a cruel joke against loyal customers, or maybe because Apple’s later computers were just sloppy releases (Cube, Flower Power anyone?). Upgrading a G4 didn’t seem viable, when for only half the price, I could get the same performance. Windows 2000 was a surprisingly stable OS, while OS X was still an infant.

For as long as I can remember, Apple’s products always arrived late in our region. I could never get my hands on the latest an greatest releases. It was a blessing in disguise, I realized, but it still ticked me off that I couldn’t write a review, praise or criticize, or at the very least, form an opnion about Apple’s latest and greatest.

Now allow me to make a bold statement: If history is an indicator, then I suggest you never buy a first-generation Apple product. Never. Ever.

Apple has a history of perfecting³ products as they go. It’s a smart strategy for a company that means business, but early adopters always suffer undesirable consequences. Apple’s first iMacs were cheap Lego-like toys. Early iPods had battery problems. Intel MacBook Pros over-heated. First generation iPhones have personality issues.

This isn’t to say that Apples products are bad. On the contrary, I currently own a 5G iPod, and I wouldn’t replace it for any other music player. My next two computers are going to be a MacBook and a 24″ iMac. And even though I’m installing Linux on the latter, I can’t help but want Apple’s hardware.

But this particular “i” trend is starting to get on my nerves. Apple has always been the symbol of defiance. The company that revolutionized computing. “The computer for the rest of us.” they said, only that goal was set aside by soaring shares.

My experience with Apple, and my support for Free software, taught me to doubt Apple, to question their tactics every now and then, to look for better alternatives, even if along the way, I end up enraging some people. Brand loyalty is worthless, if the brand I’m supporting isn’t supporting me.

1. Yes, I have my dates straight. PowerMac was introduced in 1994, while Windows 95 had no weight until late ’95, early ’96. ↑

2. Mac OS X is based on BSD, and uses a hybrid kernel. Whereas MacOS 9 and older systems use a nanokernel, which is considered to be a more modern approach to kernel design. ↑

3. Perfecting that is, not enhancing. ↑

A Word on Bashing Apple

October 29th, 2007 • 1 comment General

I can’t believe that this guy had the nerve to call this hair-brained conspiracy theory a valid counter weight to Daring Fireball’s rational analysis.

— Dan Hamilton, iPhone Bashing for Fun and Profit

I feel terrible about having to post a response on my blog, when it should be a comment on iGadget Blog.

I can’t say I’m completely surprised by the responses to my previous little post which links to a Mobile-review.com article. Nobody gets away with bashing Apple. Not even the middle man.

However, the reason I linked to such “drivel” is so I can read more responses like Dan’s. I’ll leave my share of experience with Apple to another post, but I’m not an Apple expert, and I would much rather read proper, not just emotional or sarcastic, responses to a conspiracy article.

I know for a fact that my readers are smart people, and they need no one to take them by the hand and show them the true path. They need no one to clarify that Mobile-review’s article, regardless of its validity, isn’t a response to a Daring Fireball article. I’m sure you all know where Daring Fireball ranks on my list.