<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Rails Blogs, Revisited</title>
	<link>http://ramikayyali.com/archives/2007/07/09/top10_ruby_blogs</link>
	<description>Unfocused, Opinionated.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://ramikayyali.com/archives/2007/07/09/top10_ruby_blogs#comment-31313</link>
		<author>Peter</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ramikayyali.com/archives/2007/07/09/top10_ruby_blogs#comment-31313</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Haha, valid point!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The list definitely sucks - the question is, how to improve the algorithm (if this is possible at all, without massive human interaction) to yield a better list.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The really dead entries (e.g. RedHanded) will fall out automatically (since technorati drops links  older than 120 days) and I believe alexa ranking will also decrease for these.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for the other entries... well, that's a good question. I have been discussing with a lot of people from the Ruby community about this, and we came up with a few good ideas (I think - let's see once they get implemented).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's also a question whether the Ruby/Rails blog scene sucks so much, or it's juts the algorithm... what do you think?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, valid point!</p>
<p>The list definitely sucks - the question is, how to improve the algorithm (if this is possible at all, without massive human interaction) to yield a better list.</p>
<p>The really dead entries (e.g. RedHanded) will fall out automatically (since technorati drops links  older than 120 days) and I believe alexa ranking will also decrease for these.</p>
<p>As for the other entries&#8230; well, that&#8217;s a good question. I have been discussing with a lot of people from the Ruby community about this, and we came up with a few good ideas (I think - let&#8217;s see once they get implemented).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a question whether the Ruby/Rails blog scene sucks so much, or it&#8217;s juts the algorithm&#8230; what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rami Kayyali</title>
		<link>http://ramikayyali.com/archives/2007/07/09/top10_ruby_blogs#comment-31338</link>
		<author>Rami Kayyali</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ramikayyali.com/archives/2007/07/09/top10_ruby_blogs#comment-31338</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think the Ruby blogging scene sucks, not when compared to Rails blogs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm only presuming here, but it seems to me that many Rails bloggers lose interest quickly; as if there's nothing more interesting to blog about. It could be because most Rails applications are simplistic in their nature, or because they're just database front-ends.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would love to see a blog about advanced Rubyism, or maybe something like perlmonks.org&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the Ruby blogging scene sucks, not when compared to Rails blogs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m only presuming here, but it seems to me that many Rails bloggers lose interest quickly; as if there&#8217;s nothing more interesting to blog about. It could be because most Rails applications are simplistic in their nature, or because they&#8217;re just database front-ends.</p>
<p>I would love to see a blog about advanced Rubyism, or maybe something like perlmonks.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
